Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | ZENG Rick | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | JIMENEZ Naveen | V V V D V V | V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | ZHANG GAVIN J | V V V V V V | V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
5 | LU Jingyi | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
6 | ZHANG Hanru | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
7 | WONG Jacob W. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
8 | TOOMRE Kai | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
9 | CHENG Logan | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
10 | DIAZ Gabriel | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
11 | LEE Charles T | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
12 | ZHENG Austin | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
13 | BELCHAMBER Mason | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
14 | MO Ethan | V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
15 | HART-SYED declan | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
16 | COSSROW Alex | D V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
17 | HARRA Alexander | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
18 | HOU Gaven | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
19 | SHANNON Jack | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
20 | XU Nathan | D V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
21 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
22 | CAO Justin | V D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
23 | SHAW Spencer | V V V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
24 | QIAN Zekai | D V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
25 | XIE Jicheng | D V V D D V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
26 | CHUN Zachary | D D D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
27 | JIN Andy | D D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
28 | BAKSHI Aman | D V V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
29 | TANG Royce | V D D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
30 | BAGRINTSEV Nicholas | V D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
31 | CHA James | V D D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
32 | KOVACS Harrison | D D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
33 | WANG Ancen | D V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
34 | CHEN kenneth | V D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
35 | CHANG Parker | V D D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
36 | ONIK Ari N. | V V V D D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
37 | KINGSLEY Griffin | V V D V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | GRUNENWALD Henri | V V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
39 | ZHANG Julian | V V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
40 | CHOI Hunter | D D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
41 | WANG Luke | V D V D D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
41 | REN Ryan | V D V V D D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
43 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | D V D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
44 | MA Matthew | D V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
45 | CHUN Alexander | V V D V D D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
46 | LEE Thomas | D V D V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
47 | JABLOKOV Roman | D D D V V V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
48 | LI Jayden | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
49 | KIM Daniel | D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
50 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | V D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
51 | BEYDOUN Sam | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
52 | WEISS Jonah | D D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
53 | HU Daniel | D D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
54 | JOHN Meru | V D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
55 | KRZYWON Dylan | D D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
56 | NOVIKOV Yann | V D D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
57 | ULYSSE Jacob | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
58 | HUANG Jinyao | D D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
59 | PERKINS Nathaniel | D V D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
60 | OH Joshua | V D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
61 | CHENUTULA Abhinav | D D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
62 | LIN Qianzhong | D V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
63 | ZHENG Christopher | D D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
64 | KAYE Ben | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
65 | LEE Aeden | D V V D D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
66 | ZHANG Ethan | D V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
67 | BRAIZINHA David | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
68 | WANG Joshua | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
69 | ZHANG Ethan | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
70 | SCHWERDT Jameson | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
71 | LIU Ryan | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
72 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | D D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
73 | WALDROOP Cuin | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
74 | HERBST Ari | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
75 | PITERBARG Lev | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
76 | SINCAVAGE Louis | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.