Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GONG Jerry | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 30% |
2 | DOMINIQUE Remson | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
3 | BRANDT Jaden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
3 | CHUNG Connor | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
5 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
6 | LIU Kevin | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
7 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
8 | ATWOOD Griffin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
9 | OH Aster | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
10 | SUN Andrew | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
11 | PINTO Marcus | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
12 | AO Christopher | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
13 | GONG zihao | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% |
14 | UEMOTO Ken | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
15 | WANG Weiyun | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 19% | |
16 | SCHUCHMAN Benjamin | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | LIN Philip T. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
18 | LIM Brandon | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
19 | ZHENG LEON | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 14% |
20 | MUNJULURI ruhaan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
21 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
22 | LAUB William | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
23 | WONG Caleb W. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
24 | CIEMINS Henry | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
25 | SCHIMEL Luke | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
26 | CLARK Gabriel | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
27 | MCDONALD Finn | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
28 | JI Johnson | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
29 | KIARA Kinoti | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
30 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
31 | ROSADO Sebastian | 14% | 43% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
32 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
33 | YOOK Isaac | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
34 | BARENBOYM Michael | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
35 | SAKAYEDA Jacob | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
36 | LEE Andrew | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
37 | WANG tiger | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
38 | BALE ATMAN | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
39 | CLARK Aram | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
40 | MARKARYAN Eric | 2% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | PEREIRA Beckham | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
42 | SUBA Lucas | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
43 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
44 | BAI Evan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
45 | PORTER Dupree | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
46 | CHIEN Nolan | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
47 | SALDARINI Glenn | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
48 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
48 | KENNEDY Tomás | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
50 | WANG Michael | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
51 | HO Nathaniel | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
52 | SADHU Neiyam | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
53 | AMAGOWNI Dhruv | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
54 | LUCAS William | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
55 | BAHK Caleb | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
56 | TAN Vick | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
57 | PAVLENISHVILI Luke | 4% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | SRIVATS Vedh | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
59 | ZHANG Ray | 1% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
60 | DEELY Hartigan | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
61 | FADEL Alexander | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
62 | LAZARTE Gabriel | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
63 | CHEN Ryan | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
64 | ZWAKA Jonas | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
65 | ONG Dylan | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
66 | LEVIN Jacob | 3% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
67 | DIGIACOMO Dennis G. | 10% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
68 | SAYAR Luke | 18% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
69 | NIEBERGALL Jaxson | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | FIROOZI Sam | 49% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
71 | KETT Richard | 18% | 36% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
72 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 34% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
73 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
74 | JAIN Karanvir | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
75 | HAIRABEDIAN Ellis | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
76 | JIANG Terence | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
77 | LI Aidan | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
78 | SONG Aidan | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
79 | NADGIR Jaiden | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
80 | OREN Daniel | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
81 | ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.