Perseus RYC/RJCC +Y8

Cadet Men's Saber

Saturday, May 11, 2024 at 4:30 PM

Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GONG Jerry 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 30%
2 DOMINIQUE Remson 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 5%
3 BRANDT Jaden 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
3 CHUNG Connor 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 48%
5 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 10%
6 LIU Kevin 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 33%
7 NGUYEN Anthony 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 27%
8 ATWOOD Griffin 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 18%
9 OH Aster 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 30%
10 SUN Andrew 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 4%
11 PINTO Marcus 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
12 AO Christopher 100% 100% 93% 70% 34% 8% 1%
13 GONG zihao 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 19%
14 UEMOTO Ken 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 33% 7%
15 WANG Weiyun 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 19%
16 SCHUCHMAN Benjamin 100% 99% 82% 44% 13% 2% -
17 LIN Philip T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 35%
18 LIM Brandon 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 8%
19 ZHENG LEON 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
20 MUNJULURI ruhaan 100% 99% 89% 62% 28% 7% 1%
21 MEHAN Nicholas 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 40%
22 LAUB William 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 11%
23 WONG Caleb W. 100% 98% 84% 55% 23% 5% -
24 CIEMINS Henry 100% 100% 95% 78% 45% 15% 2%
25 SCHIMEL Luke 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% -
26 CLARK Gabriel 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 34% 6%
27 MCDONALD Finn 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 24% 4%
28 JI Johnson 100% 95% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
29 KIARA Kinoti 100% 97% 82% 51% 21% 4% -
30 PRIEUR Christian F. 100% 99% 93% 73% 41% 13% 2%
31 ROSADO Sebastian 100% 86% 43% 11% 1% -
32 DE SIENA Salvatore 100% 99% 90% 59% 21% 3%
33 YOOK Isaac 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 31% 5%
34 BARENBOYM Michael 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
35 SAKAYEDA Jacob 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1%
36 LEE Andrew 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 28%
37 WANG tiger 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% -
38 BALE ATMAN 100% 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 3%
39 CLARK Aram 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
40 MARKARYAN Eric 100% 98% 80% 44% 14% 2% -
41 PEREIRA Beckham 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 15% 2%
42 SUBA Lucas 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 10%
43 ZHAO Lucas 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
44 BAI Evan 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 19% 3%
45 PORTER Dupree 100% 100% 95% 74% 37% 9% 1%
46 CHIEN Nolan 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% - -
47 SALDARINI Glenn 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
48 KOGAN Yelisey L. 100% 100% 95% 76% 41% 12% 1%
48 KENNEDY Tomás 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 10% 1%
50 WANG Michael 100% 99% 95% 77% 45% 15% 2%
51 HO Nathaniel 100% 98% 87% 54% 18% 2%
52 SADHU Neiyam 100% 99% 87% 56% 20% 3%
53 AMAGOWNI Dhruv 100% 82% 42% 11% 1% -
54 LUCAS William 100% 99% 86% 54% 21% 4% -
55 BAHK Caleb 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
56 TAN Vick 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 5% -
57 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 100% 96% 70% 32% 8% 1% -
58 SRIVATS Vedh 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 25% 4%
59 ZHANG Ray 100% 99% 81% 42% 12% 2% -
60 DEELY Hartigan 100% 97% 77% 39% 10% 1%
61 FADEL Alexander 100% 100% 96% 73% 33% 6%
62 LAZARTE Gabriel 100% 55% 15% 2% - -
63 CHEN Ryan 100% 98% 88% 61% 29% 7% 1%
64 ZWAKA Jonas 100% 86% 48% 13% 2% - -
65 ONG Dylan 100% 98% 85% 50% 16% 3% -
66 LEVIN Jacob 100% 97% 76% 39% 12% 2% -
67 DIGIACOMO Dennis G. 100% 90% 52% 17% 3% - -
68 SAYAR Luke 100% 82% 41% 10% 1% - -
69 NIEBERGALL Jaxson 100% 47% 8% 1% - -
70 FIROOZI Sam 100% 51% 12% 1% - - -
71 KETT Richard 100% 82% 46% 16% 3% - -
72 SHEYNZON Benjamin 100% 66% 24% 5% 1% - -
73 VAHABZADEH Jake R. 100% 88% 54% 20% 4% - -
74 JAIN Karanvir 100% 68% 27% 6% 1% - -
75 HAIRABEDIAN Ellis 100% 31% 4% - - - -
76 JIANG Terence 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% -
77 LI Aidan 100% 10% - - - - -
78 SONG Aidan 100% 95% 71% 35% 10% 1% -
79 NADGIR Jaiden 100% 79% 36% 7% 1% - -
80 OREN Daniel 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
81 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket 100% 48% 11% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.