Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
2 | WANG-SONG Evan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
3 | KIM Henry | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | MOSTOVOY philip | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
5 | LEE Harrison | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
5 | HENNESSY Levon | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
7 | LIN ZIJIE | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
8 | WU Matthew | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
9 | KHERSONSKY Robert | V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
10 | KATS Brandon | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
11 | NG Nico | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
12 | LUO Alexander | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
13 | CHEN Daniel | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
14 | WANG Marcus | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
15 | DAI Jason | V D D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
16 | FRIZZELL Kai | D D D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | WITHERELL Logan | V D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
18 | NOOL Alexander | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
18 | SHAPIRO Samuel | D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
20 | HONG Ethen | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
21 | ARMSTRONG Payson | V V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
22 | TSIEN Richard | V V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
23 | ZHENG Jason | D V V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
24 | WHITE Jackson | V D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
25 | SONG Aidan | V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
26 | SI Anderson | V V D D D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
27 | BHANDARE Veer | D D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
28 | CHEN Tianjun | D D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
29 | CHEN Evan | D V V V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
29 | HAN Keyi | V V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
31 | FOGEL Jake | D V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
32 | YOON Jonathan | D D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
33 | SHI Peyton | D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
34 | LIU Jeremy | D V V D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
35 | YAKHNIS Seth | V D D D V V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
36 | ZINCHUK Yuri | D V V D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
37 | MA Joseph | V V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
38 | TOPRANI Valmik | V V D D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
39 | NOOL Aaron | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
40 | SHAO Mason | V D D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
40 | CHO Adrian | V D V D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
42 | WHITE Leonardo | D V D V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
43 | DANG William | V D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
44 | ZHAO Brandon | D D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
45 | ROBINSON Blake | V V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
46 | YU George | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
47 | SMITH Theo | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
48 | ZHAO Xinkai | D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
49 | LEE Ryan | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
50 | MASKIN Mikhail | D D V D D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
51 | TANG Luke | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
52 | KESELMAN Ron | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
53 | LANE Sawyer | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
54 | KIM Louie | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
55 | JAY Vivaan | D D D D D D | D | 3.6 | 0 | -3.6 |
56 | LI Nolan | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
57 | QUAN William | D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
58 | JAISING Aaditya | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
59 | GRANT Aidan | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.