Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SINGLETON Aman | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
| 3 | KIM Henry | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 49% |
| 3 | MOSTOVOY philip | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 5 | LEE Harrison | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 5 | HENNESSY Levon | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 7 | LIN ZIJIE | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 8 | WU Matthew | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 9 | KHERSONSKY Robert | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 10 | KATS Brandon | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 11 | NG Nico | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 12 | LUO Alexander | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 14% |
| 13 | CHEN Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 14 | WANG Marcus | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 15 | DAI Jason | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 16 | FRIZZELL Kai | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | WITHERELL Logan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 18 | NOOL Alexander | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 4% | |
| 18 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 20 | HONG Ethen | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 21 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 22 | TSIEN Richard | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 23 | ZHENG Jason | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | WHITE Jackson | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | SONG Aidan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 26 | SI Anderson | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 27 | BHANDARE Veer | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 28 | CHEN Tianjun | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Evan | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 29 | HAN Keyi | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | FOGEL Jake | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | YOON Jonathan | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | SHI Peyton | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | LIU Jeremy | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | YAKHNIS Seth | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 36 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | MA Joseph | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 38 | TOPRANI Valmik | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | NOOL Aaron | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 40 | SHAO Mason | 2% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | CHO Adrian | 7% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | WHITE Leonardo | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | DANG William | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | ZHAO Brandon | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | ROBINSON Blake | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | YU George | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | SMITH Theo | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | ZHAO Xinkai | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | LEE Ryan | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MASKIN Mikhail | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 51 | TANG Luke | - | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 52 | KESELMAN Ron | 1% | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 53 | LANE Sawyer | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | KIM Louie | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | JAY Vivaan | < 1% | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 56 | LI Nolan | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | QUAN William | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 58 | JAISING Aaditya | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 59 | GRANT Aidan | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.