Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% |
2 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% |
3 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
3 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 32% |
5 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
6 | WANG yining | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
7 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
8 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
9 | SCOTT Eve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
10 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
11 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
12 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
13 | LEOU Korina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
14 | HUANG Doris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
15 | DAMBAL Sasha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
16 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
17 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
18 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
19 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 99% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
20 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
21 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
22 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
23 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
24 | RANJAN Diya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
25 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
26 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
27 | LI Alexis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
28 | UEMOTO Lynn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
29 | CONNOLLY Vida | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
30 | BAINS Nandini | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
31 | LEE Kaitlin | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
32 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
34 | STADNIK Emilia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
35 | REKHTMAN Alice | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
36 | PROBASCO Leila | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
37 | HANLON Lucy | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
39 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
40 | FODOR Claudia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
41 | MACKAY Katherine | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
42 | PRESANTH Nandana | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
43 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
44 | MAK Kaitlin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
45 | REN Katherine | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
46 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
47 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
49 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
50 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
51 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
52 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
53 | WONG Charlene | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
53 | LOURENCO Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
55 | PASUPULETI Laya | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
56 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
57 | GUHA Surabhi | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
58 | LIM Alexa J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
59 | AKULA Roszlynn | 100% | 86% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
60 | KWON Ava | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
61 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
62 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
63 | MAROSFOI Virag | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
64 | BARNES Sarah | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
65 | HARRISON Allie | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
66 | BARRY Mya | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
67 | VINOD DAS AADARSHINI | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
68 | GETZONI Mary | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
69 | VITUG Greta | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.