Forge Fencing Academy & Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SOUDERS Peter F. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 22% | 77% |
2 | CHAVES Matthew J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
3 | KALLIO Jeffrey E. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 36% |
3 | QURESHI Afzal | - | - | - | 5% | 38% | 49% | 8% |
5 | XU Ivan | - | 6% | 35% | 54% | 4% | < 1% | - |
6 | BEATY Chad A. | - | - | 1% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 7% |
7 | OFFUTT Tyler T. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 48% | 31% | |
8 | PENTON Robert | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 34% | |
9 | FORT David | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
10 | DECK Tyson | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
11 | FENKER William M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
12 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 43% | 13% |
13 | SHIM Tristan | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
14 | MOL Justin | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
15 | FRUTH Evan | 7% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
16 | EYSTER Edison | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
17 | CRAIN Bennett | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
18 | KLEIN Andrew J. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
19 | SUN Ziyao | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | - | - |
20 | BURNEY Douglas A. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 1% | - |
21 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
22 | DOBBINS James W. | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
23 | HUANG Neila | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
25 | FENG Brendan | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
26 | BRAMLETT Myer | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | KASBERG Matt | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.