Forge Fencing Academy & Club - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOUDERS Peter F. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 22% | 77% |
| 2 | CHAVES Matthew J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 3 | KALLIO Jeffrey E. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 36% |
| 3 | QURESHI Afzal | - | - | - | 5% | 38% | 49% | 8% |
| 5 | XU Ivan | - | 6% | 35% | 54% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 6 | BEATY Chad A. | - | - | 1% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 7% |
| 7 | OFFUTT Tyler T. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 48% | 31% | |
| 8 | PENTON Robert | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 34% | |
| 9 | FORT David | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 10 | DECK Tyson | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 11 | FENKER William M. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
| 12 | WISEMAN Derrick T. | - | - | - | 6% | 38% | 43% | 13% |
| 13 | SHIM Tristan | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 14 | MOL Justin | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | FRUTH Evan | 7% | 36% | 42% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | EYSTER Edison | 17% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | CRAIN Bennett | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 18 | KLEIN Andrew J. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 19 | SUN Ziyao | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% | - | - |
| 20 | BURNEY Douglas A. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | DOBBINS James W. | 15% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | HUANG Neila | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | FENG Brendan | 13% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 26 | BRAMLETT Myer | 47% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 27 | KASBERG Matt | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.