DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ADDYSON Aidan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 34% |
2 | YAO Aiden | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
3 | KONG Ethan | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
3 | YANG Hannah | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
5 | BANG Dylan | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
6 | MEGGERS Arya | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
7 | WANG Liam | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
8 | BORAN Brooks | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% |
9 | LEE Kate | - | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 18% |
10 | VORONIN Zachary | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% | 1% |
11 | PAYE Adam Trevor | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
12 | MILLER Xavier | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
13 | GRIGGS Kaiden | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% |
14 | PARY Jean Pierre | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
15 | HOWARD Katherine | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
16 | POLAGANI Krishiv | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
17 | CHANG Hannah | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
18 | HAGERMAN Mark | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - |
19 | GOPU Jyothirvida | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
20 | CHEN Zachary | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
21 | MAEDJE Abigail | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
22 | HAGERMAN Siona | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
23 | MORET Teagan | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
24 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 6% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - |
25 | WORMACK Andrew | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
26 | ADDYSON Evan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
28 | JONES Tallulah | 1% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 6% | - |
29 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 37% | 44% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
30 | GAUVEY Amelia | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.