DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 2 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
| 3 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 3 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 5 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 6 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 33% | ||
| 7 | WEI Sherry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 8 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 4% | |
| 9 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 11 | OZBAY Alp | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 11 | LIN Haley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% |
| 13 | WRIGHT Madison | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 14 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 5% | |
| 15 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 23% | ||
| 16 | POWELL Horatio | 100% | 97% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 18 | GOPU Jyothirvida | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | LEE Kate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 11% |
| 19 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | MEMON Insha | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | ||
| 22 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 24 | JAO-DOLAN Elizabeth | 100% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | ||
| 25 | KELSEY Fabienne | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | WORMACK Anthony Jr. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 27 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | GRIGGS Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | GORDON Hannah | 100% | 82% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | PERERA Chloe | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | MILLER Balthazar | 100% | 93% | 55% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 33 | MITCHELL Simon | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | FONS Amandine | 100% | 75% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | MEROLLI Asaka | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 36 | GENTRY Aiden | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 37 | PARNELL Erin | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | BLAKE Bianca | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | TURNER Nathan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.