Chesapeake Fencing Club - Towson, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 14% |
2 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
3 | CHEN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
3 | KENYON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
5 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 10% |
6 | RITTER Clayton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
7 | KENYON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 20% |
8 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
9 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
10 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
11 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
12 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
13 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
14 | SUH David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
15 | ORTIZ Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
16 | WANG Trinity | 100% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | ||
17 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | ||
18 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% | ||
19 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% | |
20 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
21 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
22 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
23 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 90% | 49% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
24 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
24 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
26 | SINHA Rounawk | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
27 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | ||
28 | BOBERTZ Hogan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | ||
29 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
30 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | ||
32 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 100% | 91% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | GORDON Rachel A. | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
34 | LIN Haley | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
35 | HOWLETT Daniel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
36 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 84% | 49% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
37 | MACTOUGH Ben | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.