Chesapeake Fencing Club - Towson, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | SERAFIN Ben | - | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 14% |
| 2 | DURKIN Tristan E. | - | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 3 | CHEN Eric | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
| 3 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 45% |
| 5 | KING Cameron | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 10% |
| 6 | RITTER Clayton | - | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 7 | KENYON Benjamin | - | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 20% |
| 8 | LEE Aiden | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 9 | LEE JoonWon | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 10 | HU Robert J. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 11 | DUAN Eric | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | YAP Nathan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 14 | SUH David | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | ORTIZ Benjamin | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | WANG Trinity | 13% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | ||
| 17 | ANAFI Ari | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | ||
| 18 | CHEN Brian | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% | ||
| 19 | MAROCHNIK Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% | |
| 20 | BOUDREAUX James | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 22 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | 4% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | BUI Ryan | 10% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 24 | CHAWLA Aarav | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | GANTSOUDES Isaac | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SINHA Rounawk | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | ||
| 28 | BOBERTZ Hogan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | ||
| 29 | TATE William Isom | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Benjamin | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | LEE DoWon | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 32 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 9% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | GORDON Rachel A. | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | LIN Haley | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | HOWLETT Daniel | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WOOLF Fredrika | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MACTOUGH Ben | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.