DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
2 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
3 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 5% | |
3 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 6% |
5 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
6 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% |
7 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | ||
8 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | ||
9 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
10 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
11 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
12 | HULL Liam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
13 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 11% |
14 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
14 | KING Cameron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
16 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | 2% |
17 | HEARNE Gavin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 91% | 70% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
18 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
19 | RACHTCHININE Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% | |
20 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
21 | PAN Colin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
22 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
23 | DAN Rex | 100% | 99% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
24 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
25 | YU Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
26 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
27 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
28 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
29 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
30 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | ROBITZSKI David R. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | ||
32 | PANDEY Yash | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
34 | ORTIZ Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
35 | VELLALA Avinash | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
36 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
37 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
38 | CHHU Allen | 100% | 95% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
39 | SINFUEGO Adrian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
41 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
42 | PARRISH Bryce W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | ||
43 | WANG Aiden | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | ||
44 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 98% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
45 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - | |
46 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
47 | SUN Ethan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
48 | MOORE Guy L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
49 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | ||
50 | WATSON Raymond | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
51 | O'REILLY Robert | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
52 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 94% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
53 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
54 | LIN Haley | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | PENHOET Evelyn | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - | |
56 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | BUI Ryan | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | |
58 | DAN Chuntao | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 3% | - | - | - |
59 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.