Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 2 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | |
| 3 | DANNULL Lukas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 3 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | 4% | |
| 5 | GILMORE Thomas W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 7% | |
| 6 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 7 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
| 8 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 10 | REN Richard | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | PAN Andrew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 12 | FORT David | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 13 | KENNEDY Liam A. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
| 14 | CRISAFULLI Francesco R. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | CHANG Eliot A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
| 16 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
| 17 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 18 | BANG Hyeonjin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 19 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 20 | LEONARD Cole | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 21 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | MOOREHEAD Patrick | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ZHOU Brian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | KOSURI Harsha | 100% | 87% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
| 25 | ZHANG Tianran | 100% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | LU Caleb Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% |
| 27 | ROZENTAL Robert | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | WANG Charles | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 29 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 31 | MENTA Varun | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | ZHU Charlie | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HYUNGJUN lee | 100% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 35 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 99% | 83% | 36% | 6% | - | |
| 36 | HOLDEN Joseph | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.