Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PUOPOLO Mia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 2 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 3 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% |
| 3 | SONPAL Vivian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% | 1% | |
| 5 | MILLÁN GARCÍA Ana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 6 | VAYNBERG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 7 | FELLMAN Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 16% |
| 8 | CHEN Miley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | PANNONE Elisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 10 | POLING Katherine | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | DEEKEN Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | HARROLD Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 13 | IREZ Lyra | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | WALSH Grace | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 51% | 21% | 4% |
| 16 | LUNEAU Isabel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | LAU Elena | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 8% | |
| 18 | ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 19 | WALMSLEY Rowan | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 20 | WANG Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 9% |
| 21 | BLACK Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
| 22 | PACHECO Dana | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 5% | - |
| 24 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | 100% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | YEE Melania | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | CUSOLITO Jacklyn | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 27 | RYDMAN Grace | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | HSIAO Jacqueline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 29 | MANNING Lynne | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 30 | VAN DE VELDE Cecile | 100% | 94% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | WILES Maeve | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BALDWIN Aimi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | BURNHAM Clarice | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LOPES Julia | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PLOURDE Meghan E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | NETTLETON Ava | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 38 | MERCHANT Reem | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | SALHANY Danielle | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | TEIXEIRA Rose | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | RIZAL Ojaswee (Oju) | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | FENTON Barbara R. | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | NAGLE Rachel | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 44 | HASSANEIN Aicha | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 1% | |
| 45 | CARDENTE Gwendolyn | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | ATTICKS rachel | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.