Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PUOPOLO Mia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 2 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 3 | WILBERT Gwendolyn (Gwen) A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 3 | SONPAL Vivian | 1% | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 1% | |
| 5 | MILLÁN GARCÍA Ana | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
| 6 | VAYNBERG Ellen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 7 | FELLMAN Sara | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 67% | 16% |
| 8 | CHEN Miley | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | PANNONE Elisa | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 10 | POLING Katherine | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | DEEKEN Anna | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | HARROLD Sophia | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 13 | IREZ Lyra | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | GUILLETTE Hazel | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 15 | WALSH Grace | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
| 16 | LUNEAU Isabel | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 17 | LAU Elena | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 39% | 8% | |
| 18 | ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 19 | WALMSLEY Rowan | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | WANG Grace | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 28% | 9% |
| 21 | BLACK Sarah | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 22 | PACHECO Dana | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | MURDOCH ROY Grace | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 5% | - |
| 24 | KOUZNETSKI Tais | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | YEE Melania | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 26 | CUSOLITO Jacklyn | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 27 | RYDMAN Grace | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | HSIAO Jacqueline | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
| 29 | MANNING Lynne | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 30 | VAN DE VELDE Cecile | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 31 | WILES Maeve | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BALDWIN Aimi | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | BURNHAM Clarice | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | LOPES Julia | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PLOURDE Meghan E. | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | KOPACZ Lindsay | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | NETTLETON Ava | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | MERCHANT Reem | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | SALHANY Danielle | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | TEIXEIRA Rose | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | RIZAL Ojaswee (Oju) | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 42 | FENTON Barbara R. | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | NAGLE Rachel | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 44 | HASSANEIN Aicha | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 45 | CARDENTE Gwendolyn | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | ATTICKS rachel | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.