Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | GERACI Paul A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 3 | PRIJATEL John R. | D D D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 3 | WILLIAMS Logan | D V V V D D | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 5 | SERAFYM Damian | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 6 | TURNER Joshua | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 7 | MASON Alexander T. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 8 | LAUER Michael | D D D D V V | V V D | 4.7 | 2 | -2.7 |
| 9 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 11 | HAUCK Samuel J. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 12 | SAMUEL Nirmel | V D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | BURKHARDT Krista L. | V V D D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 14 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 15 | TANG Elaine | D D V V V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 16 | VAN DYK Mark | V D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | SWANSON Dave | V D V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 18 | FULLER II Thomas | D V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 19 | CRAPNELL Daniel | D D D V V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 20 | TANG Ellen | V V D D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | MILLER Hayden | V V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | SAYLER Gordon | D D V D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | MILLER Brent | D V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | REEN Stephen | V D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 25 | BRENNEMAN Adam | V D D D V D | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 26 | MCNARY Sean | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 27 | FAENOVA Alexandra | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 28 | TARR Robert | D D D V D D | D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
| 29 | STAUBITZ Marc | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 30 | BRETHAUER Adah | D D V D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 31 | HENDERSON Emery | V D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 32 | PLUMMER Ken | D D D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 33 | MCNARY Ross | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 34 | SEWALD Ronda | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 35 | DUTTON Kitty | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.