Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SOBESHKEVYCH Roman | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
2 | GERACI Paul A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
3 | PRIJATEL John R. | - | - | - | 4% | 38% | 51% | 7% |
3 | WILLIAMS Logan | - | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
5 | SERAFYM Damian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
6 | TURNER Joshua | - | - | 2% | 16% | 48% | 31% | 3% |
7 | MASON Alexander T. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
8 | LAUER Michael | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
9 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
10 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
11 | HAUCK Samuel J. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
12 | SAMUEL Nirmel | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
13 | BURKHARDT Krista L. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
14 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
15 | TANG Elaine | 5% | 30% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
16 | VAN DYK Mark | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
17 | SWANSON Dave | - | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
18 | FULLER II Thomas | - | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
19 | CRAPNELL Daniel | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
20 | TANG Ellen | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
21 | MILLER Hayden | 2% | 15% | 40% | 38% | 5% | - | - |
22 | SAYLER Gordon | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
23 | MILLER Brent | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
24 | REEN Stephen | - | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | BRENNEMAN Adam | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
26 | MCNARY Sean | 1% | 32% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
27 | FAENOVA Alexandra | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | TARR Robert | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
29 | STAUBITZ Marc | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
30 | BRETHAUER Adah | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
31 | HENDERSON Emery | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
32 | PLUMMER Ken | 27% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
33 | MCNARY Ross | 15% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
34 | SEWALD Ronda | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
35 | DUTTON Kitty | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.