Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Zhixiao | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% | |
| 2 | HOAGLAND Sally | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 3 | PAN Angela | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 7% |
| 3 | PARSONS Mischa | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 5 | DAGLI Sai | 3% | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 6 | GUO Callista | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 7 | PHUONG Elaine | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 8 | SKLAR Davida | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 9 | SIU Maple | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 10 | BURNHAM Sarah | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 11 | FOMINA Polina | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | CONNOLLY Natasha | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 46% | 3% | |
| 13 | TIBBETTS Lily | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 13 | BRODEUR Andrea | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 15 | LEE Hwaeun | 1% | 7% | 20% | 31% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 16 | SCHELTZ Kimberly | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | NGUYEN Celena | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 18 | CAFASSO Sabrina | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 19 | SETO Karen | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | MARCHANT Morgan | 2% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
| 22 | MILLER Cassandra | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ADAMS Agatha | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | SONG Charlotte | 2% | 21% | 46% | 27% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | GERBOTH Lauren | 1% | 8% | 33% | 44% | 14% | - | |
| 26 | DIOH Nicole | 49% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 27 | STOCKTON Catherine | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | CROWDER Julia | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | BOWLING Lillian | 2% | 12% | 26% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | HALL Henrietta | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | ONTIVEROS Sara D. | 4% | 16% | 30% | 29% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
| 32 | KELLY Diane A. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | CUFF Addison | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | BANNERMAN Courtney | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 35 | YOUNGER Eleanor | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
| 36 | LIU Ilana | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | COVINO Mila | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | SCHAU DeHavilland | 62% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.