Marin Fencing Academy - San Rafael, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | COHEN Benjamin A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | HSU Hao | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 3 | GOLDBERG Artie M. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | HUSSAM hussam | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 6 | LI Yunji (Rain) | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | XU Yanwen | V V V V D | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 8 | LAURIMAA Emil | V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | GREEN Jabreel | V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 10 | CAMPBELL-KRUGER Adam W. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | SWANSON Carl G. | V V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | YUEN Nathan | V D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | LIN Andrew | V V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 14 | KIM Ian | V D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 15 | LIN Ashley | V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | BHATT Arjun | D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | AU Marcus J. | D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 18 | LIANG Jingjing | V V D V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 19 | BHATT Anisha | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 20 | WILLIAMS Brett | D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | SALESKY Nicholas M. | V D V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | LOUIE Joseph | V V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 23 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 24 | LIU Yichen | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | LIN Shenghai | D V D D V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 26 | BAUMAN Colin | D D D V D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 27 | LIN Jason | D D V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 29 | MCCORMICK Nolan | D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | HUANG Wei Wei | D D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 31 | MCGUIRE Maximilien | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | CHIEM Karen | D D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 33 | LIPTON Michael D. | D D D V D V | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 34 | LI Sean | D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 35 | DILEEP Roshan | D V D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 36 | JACKSON Susana | D D D D V D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 37 | BURGSTONE Benjamin | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 38 | ZGRAGGEN dale | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
| 39 | PERALTA Christian | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.