Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | WATRALL Rick | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 30% |
| 3 | AMELI Sean | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 5 | JUGAN Bruce M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 6 | DEPOMMIER Remi | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 7 | SWANSON Dave | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 8 | VARNEY John R. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 9 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | BAXTER Daniel J. | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
| 11 | JENSEN David | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% |
| 12 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 13 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 26% | 6% |
| 14 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% |
| 15 | GLASS Timothy C. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 16 | PIERRO Roger | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | WHEELER Mark C. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 18 | HUGHES Michael D. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 19 | CROUCH William John (John) | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 20 | DEW Eric | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 21 | RICHARDS Dick | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 22 | EVANS Allen L. | - | 2% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 23 | HUDSON Jeffrey (Jeff) A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 24 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 25 | BUSH Thomas | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 27 | RANES Evan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
| 28 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | GLENNON Michael | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | POPPRE Michael N. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | MARKOWITZ William M. | 8% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | SIEDOW Jeffrey | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | HOWARD Eric F. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 34 | WAGMAN Robert S. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | MARIANI Lou | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 36 | PERKA Michael | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 37 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | BAXTER David | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 39 | MITCHELL Matthew D. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | BECK Brian C. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SCOTT George R. | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 42 | HUNKER Frederick | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | DELGADO Jr. Eli M. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 44 | STONE Ken | 27% | 64% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 45 | WALTING Paul J. | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | ROSENTHAL Paul E. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | MEAGHER Roderick | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | WHITE Scott | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 50 | SMITH Herman E. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 10% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | RIVERA Ricky N. | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | KLEIN Johannes | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WHITELOCK James R. | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | ANDERSON Michael L. | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LONADIER Robert | 66% | 32% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.