Greater Columbus Convention Center - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 2 | MULLER Inara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 3 | NEMORIN Rei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% | |
| 3 | VUDTHITHAMRONG Vivienne | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
| 5 | HWANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | |
| 6 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 11% |
| 7 | CORD Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 8 | CHEN Cindy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
| 9 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
| 10 | KATZ Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 11 | CHENG Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 12 | FAN Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 13 | KANIA Brigitte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 10% |
| 14 | MALUKI Nia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% | |
| 15 | SARATH Sana | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ARGUELLO Camilla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 17 | GAO Olivia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | WINSLOW Zaria | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | ESTEVES ZOE | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 20 | HU Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
| 21 | DUDNICK Caitlin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 22 | TABANCAY Ava | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | LIN Rongxuan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 24 | YAP Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
| 25 | NARRELL Olive | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 26 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 27 | CHANG Grace | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | ZOFFEL Gabriela | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 29 | KARAVAS Lucy | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 30 | MACHIRAJU Ishita | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | CHACKO Anne | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 32 | SOUTHWELL Mia | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | LONG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 34 | WEI Levana | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
| 35 | CHEN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 36 | DANIELS Jordanna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 36 | MENON Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 46% | 11% | |
| 38 | BAO Amelia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | YANG Felicia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 8% |
| 40 | CAO Kim | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 41 | POWERS Waverly | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 42 | LIANG Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 43 | ZHOU Carolyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | |
| 43 | SON Ellie | 100% | 69% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | SHI Maxine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
| 46 | LUC Christabel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 47 | GUERVILLE Angelique | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 48 | BRIMMER Bella | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 49 | LIU Isabel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | SUTHERLAND Sadie | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | KETT alexis | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 52 | BRIAN Gigi | 100% | 77% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | LAMTAN Trinity | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 54 | VARAH Alaia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 55 | KONDE Anika | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 56 | CONG Catherine | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 2% | |
| 57 | QIU Abigail | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 58 | ZHOU kelsey | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | HUANG Megan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 60 | FADEL Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 61 | ASHIKHMINA Agniya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 62 | SAXENA Devina Shyamli | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | LEE Elise | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 64 | SRA Nureen | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 65 | WU Jing | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 66 | LOMOTAN Audrey | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 67 | YU Sydney | 100% | 57% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 68 | WILLER Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 69 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 70 | KRITZ Sofia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 71 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 80% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | FREY Elise | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 73 | ZHAO Audrey | 100% | 84% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | FASSNACHT Jacqueline | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | CHAN Clara | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | THOMAS Sophia | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 77 | MAZZURCO Marin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 78 | POTDAR Harper | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | TANG Athena | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 80 | HAN yujie | 100% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | GARCIA RODRIGUEZ Victoria Maria | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 82 | RADELL Zoe | 100% | 63% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 83 | LIN Emma | 100% | 90% | 52% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 83 | YAO Elizabeth | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | ARANGO Ivanna | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 86 | MARTINSON Corinne | 100% | 75% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 87 | LATAWA Navya | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 87 | PURITZ Morgan | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | SEELMAN Alexa | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | ROBBINS Lydia | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | KENNEDY Elizabeth | 100% | 65% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.