Chesapeake Fencing Club - Towson, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BANKULLA Nihal R. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% | |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | 9% | 43% | 47% | |
| 3 | BAGHA Armin | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
| 3 | ZENG Andrew | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 1% | |
| 5 | RITTER Clayton | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% | |
| 6 | COUGHLIN Nolan E. | - | - | 2% | 21% | 53% | 24% | |
| 7 | KENYON Benjamin | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 8 | TATE William Isom | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | MEGGERS Davin | - | 5% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 4% | |
| 10 | DAN Rex | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | SEIKEL Spencer | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | KING Cameron | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
| 13 | YAP Nathan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 14 | WU Shaochi | 6% | 32% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 15 | MCGOVERN Vincent J. | - | 1% | 13% | 53% | 29% | 4% | |
| 16 | KIM Jaden | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | CUMMINGS Owen | 45% | 44% | 10% | < 1% | - | - | |
| 18 | ZHANG Jason | 2% | 39% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 19 | GORDON Rachel A. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 20 | BJERKNESS Riley | 23% | 51% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | CHAWLA Aarav | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | DAN Chuntao | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | MEGGERS Samuel | - | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 24 | TAN Theodore | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 25 | WHEELER Andreas | 6% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.