Brooklyn, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BEZRODNOV Michael | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | BEZRODNOV Alexander | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | KATS Dylan G. | V V D V D | V V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 4 | ALIMOV fayzulla | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 5 | EROLCEVIK Doruk | V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | HORVATH Adam | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 7 | SVIDNYTSKIY Artem | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 8 | HU Robert J. | V D D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 9 | MAZUR Daniil | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 10 | MATVEEV Valentin S. | D V V D V V | V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 11 | KOYFMAN Benjamin | D D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 12 | MITEV Alexander | D D V V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 13 | CHEN Leonardo | D V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | REPIC Oliver | V V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 15 | SAVORETTI Pietro | V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 16 | ANDERSON Kai | D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | ATKINS Levi H. | V D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 18 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | BURATTI Fausto | V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 20 | BRODSKY Julian | D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | LAI Boden | V V D V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | SHCHUR Landon | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | SAVORETTI Francesco | D V D V V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 24 | LAI Aedin | V D D V D V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 25 | ZAYDMAN Ethan | V D D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D V D D V D | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 27 | ENSLEY Diego | D D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | RVACHEV Michael | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 29 | POMA Antonio | D V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 30 | GOMEZ NG Juan Jose | D D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 32 | WENG Zoe | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | EVANS George | D D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | MASSE Jack | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 35 | BRYKOWYTCH Anton | D D V D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 36 | TESFAYE Elias | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 37 | SHTEYNBLIK Michael | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 38 | PEDICONE Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 39 | SPILLER Hiro | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.