Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 40% | |
| 2 | SAFKO Jeffrey A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 3 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 49% | 27% | |
| 3 | YAKIMENKO Andrei | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 5 | HUTZ Michael B. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 39% | 4% |
| 6 | XIE Andrew J. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 32% | 2% |
| 7 | SEIKEL Spencer | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 8 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
| 9 | LUM-DEBONO Adam | 1% | 27% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 10 | CONLEY Seth | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 11 | KARASICK Andrew | - | 2% | 19% | 48% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 12 | COTLAR Andrew D. | - | 3% | 22% | 50% | 23% | 3% | |
| 13 | DOLBOW Trevor | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 14 | SCHLEE Selma | 12% | 39% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | SOKALSKI Edwin | 9% | 47% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
| 16 | MAGUIRE Timothy | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 17 | TAN Theodore | 12% | 42% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 18 | WHITTINGTON Kelly | 41% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 19 | RENZ Sarah | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.