Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Charles | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 2 | ZHOU Shawn | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 3 | PARK Andrew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 3 | LEE Jaden | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 5 | YANG Tate | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 6 | LEE Abin | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 7 | TAO Jiemi | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 8 | YU Eric | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 9 | LEUNG Tsun Yin (TY) | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 10 | GANAPATHI Eshan | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 11 | PAN Ethan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 12 | YOU Alan | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 13 | WANG sicheng | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 14 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 15 | OH Christopher | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 16 | RAU Shogun | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | YEE Colin | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 18 | FUKUDA Brando | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 19 | YANG Steve | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | YE Jerry | - | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% |
| 21 | HO Christopher | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | SLAIN Owen | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | EVANS Desmond | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
| 24 | LEE Conrad | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | PESKIN Kepler | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | HE Ian | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 27 | LI Ryan | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 28 | CHEN Kurtis | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | CHEN Ryker | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | BEDWORTH Alistair | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 31 | WONG Connor | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | XU Ethan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 33 | HONG Edwin | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 34 | SYMMANK Callen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | KUANG Vincent | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | HE Gary | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | LI Lief | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | MURDOCK Koichi | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | YU Jinyuan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | PARK Avan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | CREMEL Remi | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Kyle | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 43 | ALVAREZ Francisco Janusz | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | ROBERTS Nikolai | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 45 | LIN Alden | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | RYU GREYSON | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 47 | DING Sam | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 48 | ZHENG Jonathan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CHANG Austin | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | LI Yunze | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 51 | SAVAGE Angus | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LI Andrew | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | ZHANG Derek | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | LI Alex | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | LI Jonathan | 9% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | LIN Conrad | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 57 | CUI Max | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | QIU Yiran | 64% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | RAMIREZ Nicanor | 26% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | LAM Lazarus | 14% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 60 | MA Madrid | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | CHONG Tanner | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | YAN Aaron | 46% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.