Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | LI Richard | V D V V D D | V V V V V V | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
2 | LAI Boden | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | WU Jonathan | D V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
3 | SAVORETTI Francesco | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
5 | LIU Adam | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
6 | SAVORETTI Pietro | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
7 | CHEN Allen | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
8 | HU Lucas | D D V D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
9 | WONG King-Yee | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
10 | TRAN Spencer | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
11 | WANG Daniel | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
12 | MEN Junda | D D V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
13 | PRIHODKO Max | V V D D V V | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
14 | DOUBOV Andrew | V V D D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
15 | RIM Eugene | D D V D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
16 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | D D V D D D | V V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
17 | BELLIVEAU Emmett S. | V V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
18 | LAI Aedin | V V V V V V | D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
19 | KARIMOV Amir | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
20 | SONG Changze | V V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
21 | WHITE Aidan | V V V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
22 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | D V D V D V | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
23 | FENG Du | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
24 | CHEN Luowen | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
25 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | D D D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
25 | RVACHEV Michael | D V D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
27 | ZENG Andrew | V D D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | LIU Jeremiah W. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
29 | GUAN Nathan | D D V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
30 | GLUSHKOV David | D D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
31 | SHOUSHA Yassin | V D D D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
32 | TESFAYE Elias | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
33 | FEINBERG James Y. | V D V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
34 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | V D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
35 | XIE Brandon | V D V V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
36 | KIM Nathan | V V D D V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
37 | ZHANG Dinghao | D V D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
38 | SINGLETON Aman | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
39 | MASSE Jack | D V D V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
40 | SONG Ryan | D V D V V D | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
41 | PAN Anthony | V D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
42 | BAJAJ Nakul | V V D D D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
43 | HELMY Richard | D D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
44 | DOWD Peter L. | V D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
44 | PETERSEN Zachary | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
46 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | V V D D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
47 | SHA Michael | D V D D V D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
48 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | V D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
49 | PESSIN Nadav | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
50 | BO Genero | D V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
51 | KELLEY Hayden | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
52 | KIM Remington | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
52 | GU Eric | D D D V D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
54 | ZHAI Christopher | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
55 | OSHIMA Robert | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
55 | CONNER James | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.