Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
| 2 | QU Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | |
| 3 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
| 3 | SUSANTO William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 55% | 10% | |
| 5 | LI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 5% | |
| 6 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 7 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 8 | CAO Jeremy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 9 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | |
| 10 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 3% | |
| 11 | SUN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 47% | 10% | |
| 12 | ROPER Griffin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 13 | MONDESIR Chace | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
| 14 | HU Michael | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | |
| 15 | ZHENG Vincent | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 2% | |
| 16 | FAN Ze Lin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | |
| 17 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 21% | 2% | |
| 18 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 19 | GOLI Arush | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 20 | ZHANG Eric | 100% | 98% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | CHEN Keegan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | XIA Vincent | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | BU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% | |
| 24 | HU Weijie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 25 | LIN Ziyue | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 7% | |
| 26 | BRADY David | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | GENG Vincent | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | LECH Landon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | |
| 29 | CUI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 30 | LIU Brady | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | YIN Andrew | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HUANG Alec | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | XU Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | LU Ethan | 100% | 92% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | YANG Mark | 100% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | XU Jaden | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BHOSREKAR Som | 100% | 55% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 39 | DUAN Desmond | 100% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | WANG Grant | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | DAVE Neil | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | HO James | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 43 | WONG Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.