Danvers Indoor Sports - Danvers, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | QIAN Zekai | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
2 | QU Richard | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
3 | CHANG Parker | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 17% | |
3 | SUSANTO William | - | - | 7% | 37% | 45% | 10% | |
5 | LI Jayden | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
6 | ZHANG Aaron | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
7 | CHOI Hunter | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
8 | CAO Jeremy | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
9 | HAN Jiaren | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
10 | REN Ryan | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 3% | |
11 | SUN Nathan | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 10% | |
12 | ROPER Griffin | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
13 | MONDESIR Chace | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
14 | HU Michael | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
15 | ZHENG Vincent | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% | |
16 | FAN Ze Lin | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% | |
17 | ZHAO David | - | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% | |
18 | ZHONG Kingsley | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% | |
19 | GOLI Arush | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% | |
20 | ZHANG Eric | 2% | 19% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | |
21 | CHEN Keegan | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | |
22 | XIA Vincent | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
23 | BU Ethan | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
24 | HU Weijie | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
25 | LIN Ziyue | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 35% | 7% | |
26 | BRADY David | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
27 | GENG Vincent | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
28 | LECH Landon | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
29 | CUI Ryan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% | |
30 | LIU Brady | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
31 | YIN Andrew | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | HUANG Alec | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
33 | XU Nicholas | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
34 | SUN Andrew | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
35 | LU Ethan | 8% | 44% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | YANG Mark | 23% | 48% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
37 | XU Jaden | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
38 | BHOSREKAR Som | 45% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
39 | DUAN Desmond | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
40 | WANG Grant | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | DAVE Neil | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | HO James | 1% | 12% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
43 | WONG Maxwell | 1% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.