Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KIM Gene | - | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 67% |
| 2 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 3 | KIM Julian | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
| 3 | LEE Leo | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 5 | KROPP Wesley | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 40% | 37% |
| 6 | KUANG Cyrus | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 7 | XUE Michael | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 8 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 37% | 5% |
| 9 | WU Matthew | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 10 | YAO Ryan | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 11 | CHEN Tianjun | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 12 | ALI Rayan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Jason | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 14 | KIM Doyun | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 15 | ROBERTS Arthur | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | SHIM Jae | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 17 | LIU Austin | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 7% |
| 18 | YAO Aiden | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 12% | |
| 19 | YUE Bryan | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 2% | |
| 20 | LIU Yihong | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | ||
| 21 | PLUMMER Kellan | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CHIANG William | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | LI Andy | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 24 | LAI Jayden | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | GEVA Reuben | 1% | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 26 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 27 | PARK Ethan | 1% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | - |
| 28 | HOLDEN Harrison | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 29 | YAKUB Noah | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | YU Brandon | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | DISPENZA Jayan | 2% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 32 | RAU Shogun | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 33 | ZHANG Aiden | - | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | ||
| 34 | SHIM Jaeyoo | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% | ||
| 35 | CHO JOSHUA | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | KIM Leejay | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 37 | FRENCH Drake | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | CHEN Linus | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | GARIKIPATI Tharan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | ISMAILOV Alan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHAU Ivan | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 42 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | ZHAN ETHAN | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 44 | ZHAO Brandon | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | ZHOU Luke | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | DESAI Adithya | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | TANG Daniel | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | XIONG Alec | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | ||
| 49 | TORNBERG Winston | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | CHEN Benjamin | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | LI Stephen | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% | |
| 52 | WU Jayden | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | JIMENEZ PARRA Dorian D | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 10% | |
| 54 | ZHAO ryan | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | ROBERTSON Marnix | - | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 56 | GUO zhaohong | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | ADDYSON Evan | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | GOLDBERG Simon | 4% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 59 | THOMSON Piers | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 60 | MONTGOMERY Jaxon | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 61 | LIEM Silas | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | ||
| 62 | HUANG EVAN | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | DE LOS REYES Noah | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | TAN Samuel | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | SATHYAN Dhruv | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.