Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YILMAZ Pinar | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 64% |
2 | CARCELLER Bernardita (Tini) | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
3 | NEELAM Navya | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 78% | |
3 | PEI Claire | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
5 | BEATIE Isabella M. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
6 | WU Jessica | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% | |
7 | QI Julieanne | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
8 | OLELE Ifechi | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
9 | XU Yvette, Zixuan | - | - | - | 8% | 32% | 42% | 18% |
10 | MCQUEEN Morgan | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
11 | FLITMAN Gabrielle | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
12 | DHAIYA Tanya | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 2% |
13 | HALE Avery | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
14 | LISCUM Vivian | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 27% |
15 | HUANG Selina | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
16 | HE Anna | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 43% | 17% | |
17 | CHERNIS Liah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 47% | 13% |
18 | HOLDEN Helena | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
19 | WANG Chantal | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
20 | DU Chloe | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
21 | XU Jessica | - | - | 6% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 2% |
22 | NORRIS Morgan | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | |
23 | KUTSY Olga | - | - | 5% | 29% | 56% | 10% | |
24 | KROPP Anne | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
25 | KANASKAR Ila | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 34% | |
26 | KANE Alexa | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
26 | AWALEGAONKAR Saina | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 41% | 14% | |
28 | LEE Kate | 1% | 14% | 42% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | YOUNG Nicole | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
30 | NING Miranda | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
31 | VIOLETTE Lih-Ann | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
32 | LI Anna | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
33 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 1% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% | - | |
34 | OLSON Olivia | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
35 | LEE Kaitlyn | 7% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
36 | JORDAN Zoe | - | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% |
37 | DESAI Eesha | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
38 | MCCREIGHT Elena | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
39 | REN Ivanka | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 1% | - | |
40 | ZHANG Jane | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
41 | BRINDAVAN Vyahriti | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | FAN Joy | 6% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
43 | LIN Gianna | 16% | 43% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
44 | WANG Ailly | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
45 | FENG Esther | 28% | 47% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | SHIBU Pavitra | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
47 | BUCA Nora | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
48 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
49 | YOUN Emily | 18% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
50 | ROMANOV Mia | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
51 | KOSIM Irene | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
52 | PEKKER Adel | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
53 | HU Avery | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
54 | ELLMER Ava | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | - | - | |
55 | BAGASRAWALA Nadia | 57% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
56 | HALE Reagan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
57 | FLYNN Kensington | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
58 | KONERU Anvitha | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
59 | MADA SAMANVITHA | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
60 | LI Jasmine | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
61 | SHI Elle | 18% | 51% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
62 | YOUN Kylie | 21% | 47% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - |
63 | TUMULA Anima | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.