Dallas Market Hall - Dallas, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | YILMAZ Pinar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 64% |
2 | CARCELLER Bernardita (Tini) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
3 | NEELAM Navya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% | |
3 | PEI Claire | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | |
5 | BEATIE Isabella M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
6 | WU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
7 | QI Julieanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% |
8 | OLELE Ifechi | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
9 | XU Yvette, Zixuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 18% |
10 | MCQUEEN Morgan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
11 | FLITMAN Gabrielle | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
12 | DHAIYA Tanya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 2% |
13 | HALE Avery | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
14 | LISCUM Vivian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% |
15 | HUANG Selina | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
16 | HE Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | |
17 | CHERNIS Liah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 13% |
18 | HOLDEN Helena | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
19 | WANG Chantal | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | - |
20 | DU Chloe | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
21 | XU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 60% | 19% | 2% |
22 | NORRIS Morgan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 7% | |
23 | KUTSY Olga | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 10% | |
24 | KROPP Anne | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
25 | KANASKAR Ila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
26 | KANE Alexa | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
26 | AWALEGAONKAR Saina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | |
28 | LEE Kate | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | YOUNG Nicole | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
30 | NING Miranda | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
31 | VIOLETTE Lih-Ann | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
32 | LI Anna | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
33 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 11% | - | |
34 | OLSON Olivia | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
35 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
36 | JORDAN Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% |
37 | DESAI Eesha | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
38 | MCCREIGHT Elena | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% | |
39 | REN Ivanka | 100% | 91% | 58% | 17% | 1% | - | |
40 | ZHANG Jane | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
41 | BRINDAVAN Vyahriti | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | FAN Joy | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
43 | LIN Gianna | 100% | 84% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - |
44 | WANG Ailly | 100% | 93% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
45 | FENG Esther | 100% | 72% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - |
46 | SHIBU Pavitra | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
47 | BUCA Nora | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 5% | |
48 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | 100% | 94% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
49 | YOUN Emily | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | |
50 | ROMANOV Mia | 100% | 75% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
51 | KOSIM Irene | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
52 | PEKKER Adel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
53 | HU Avery | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
54 | ELLMER Ava | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | - | - | |
55 | BAGASRAWALA Nadia | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | |
56 | HALE Reagan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
57 | FLYNN Kensington | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
58 | KONERU Anvitha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
59 | MADA SAMANVITHA | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
60 | LI Jasmine | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
61 | SHI Elle | 100% | 82% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
62 | YOUN Kylie | 100% | 79% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - |
63 | TUMULA Anima | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.