Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
| 2 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 3 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 3 | WANG Zoe | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 5 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 6 | LEE Olivia | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 7 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 8 | WANG Victoria | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | LAI Amanda | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 11 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | 1% |
| 12 | WANG Jessie | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 13 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 14 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 15 | ZHUANG Lauren | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 13% |
| 17 | GUO Luxi | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 18 | DALEY Keira | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 19 | LEE Camilla | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | - |
| 22 | CHEN Jingyun | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | SYKES Elynor | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 24 | SUN Karolyn | 10% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 25 | AIRES Julia | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 26 | SUN Hanya | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
| 27 | ENRILE Erica | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | HAU Olivia | 3% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 29 | DUONG Zoey | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 30 | WANG Angelina | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 31 | CHUNG Penelope | 2% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | BLANCO Ariia | 13% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | PHUKAN Indra | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | HANKINS Morgan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | SCHOR Elisabeth | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 37 | GUERRERO Victoria | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 38 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
| 39 | PROKOP Jeannine A. | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% | |
| 40 | SHELIN Chelsea | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 41 | BUSH emma | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 42 | LEE Yeriel | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | ZHU Riley | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | GUAN Isabella | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 45 | XU Celina | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | RALSTON Katherine | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | SCANLAN Claire | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | HEPLER Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 49 | CAMAMA Tessa | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 50 | PACHECO Carys | 32% | 40% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CHAN Allison M. | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 52 | SHARMA Sanvi | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 53 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 54 | JAMES Ashley | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | MADRID Maureen | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | LIN Isabel | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | REED Katya | 14% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | MITTMAN Lela Z. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 59 | ZHAO Yanning | 25% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | EYUNNI Vibha | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | RADOV Una | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | KAUSHISH Sara | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 63 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 64 | BLASKO Judit | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 65 | POON Desiree | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 39% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 67 | MARIKOS Christina | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | KROTZ Gemma | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.