NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 2 | KHAN Alissa | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 3 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 3 | MALEK Zolie | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% | ||
| 5 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
| 6 | FOSS Persephone | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | HUANG Doris | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 8 | MACKAY Katherine | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | LEOU Korina | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 10 | ATTIA Jasmine | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 12 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 13 | WU Yuwei | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 14 | DAMBAL Sasha | 1% | 10% | 36% | 40% | 13% | ||
| 15 | TENG EMMA | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | |
| 16 | MCMAHON Kylin S. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | NAYAK Antara | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 18 | KWON Ava | - | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 19 | BROWN Aria | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | BERMAN Greta | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 21 | HUANG Neila | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 22 | SHMULER Fiona | - | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 24 | STADNIK Emilia | - | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | |
| 25 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 26 | XIE Nora | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 27 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 28 | VINOKUR Anita | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% | ||
| 29 | LIU Chelsea | 5% | 48% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | UEMOTO Lynn | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | LEE Kaitlin | 3% | 38% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | MAK Kaitlin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 33 | BUSH Bethany | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 31% | 4% |
| 34 | LEE Alyson | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 35 | HU Anna | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 36 | NAYAK Esha | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 39 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | KIM Audrey | 15% | 46% | 31% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 41 | LAGOON Miriam | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | AKULA Roszlynn | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | SHELLEY Scarlett | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | KHOST Maeve | 11% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | CHAVAN Arya | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% |
| 46 | GUHA Surabhi | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | RIFKIN Lielle | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | BAINS Nandini | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 49 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | WONG Charlene | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | LIM Alexa J. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LAI Kaitlyn | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | BARNES Sarah | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
| 54 | GETZONI Mary | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | LAI Evelyn | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | LEUNG Ella | 83% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | HUANG Zoe | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.