Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | |
| 2 | GUERRERO Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 6% |
| 3 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
| 3 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 5 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
| 6 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 7 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% | |
| 8 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 9 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 10 | HUBER Pia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 11 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 28% | 4% |
| 12 | BUSH Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 13 | GUO Luxi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 15 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 20% | 2% | |
| 16 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | < 1% |
| 18 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 19 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | |
| 21 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
| 22 | WANG Jessie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 23 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
| 24 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 25 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 26 | MARSH Janet L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 19% |
| 27 | SUN Karolyn | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 28 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | 2% | |
| 30 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 31 | XU Jessica | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | XU Celina | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | HANKINS Morgan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 34 | HARRISON Amelia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% |
| 35 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% | |
| 36 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | LEE Yeriel | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 18% | - | |
| 44 | CHANG Abigail | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | SCANLAN Claire | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZHU Riley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
| 48 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | SALISTRA Emilia | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | BURICEA Ada | 100% | 82% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | YUMIACO Nylah | 100% | 77% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIN Isabel | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 100% | 68% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | JAMES Ashley | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 55 | KANE Chloe | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | ZHAO Yanning | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | REVAK Kelly | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | CHAN Allison M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 60 | GINTOWT Catherine | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.