Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | VAN BRUMMEN Anna C. | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% | |
2 | GUERRERO Victoria | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
3 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
3 | PHUKAN Indra | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
5 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
6 | WANG Angelina | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
7 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
8 | LEE Natasha | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
9 | WANG Zoe | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
10 | HUBER Pia | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
11 | PECK Maia A. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% |
12 | BUSH Emma | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
13 | GUO Luxi | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
14 | SUN Hanya | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
15 | WANG Victoria | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
16 | HEPLER Sarah | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
17 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | < 1% |
18 | CHUNG Penelope | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
19 | LEE Camilla | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
20 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% | |
21 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
22 | WANG Jessie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
23 | MUN Brianna K. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
24 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
25 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
26 | MARSH Janet L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 19% |
27 | SUN Karolyn | 18% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
28 | HUANG Lanlan | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
29 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 36% | 2% | |
30 | SHELIN Chelsea | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
31 | XU Jessica | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
32 | XU Celina | 4% | 25% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
33 | HANKINS Morgan | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
34 | HARRISON Amelia H. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
35 | LAI Amanda | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 4% | |
36 | CHANG Celine A. | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | - | |
37 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
38 | HSIU Elizabeth | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
39 | BLANCO Ariia | 19% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
40 | KAUSHISH Sara | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
41 | LEE Yeriel | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
42 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
43 | LEE Olivia | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% | - | |
44 | CHANG Abigail | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
44 | SCANLAN Claire | 31% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
46 | ZHU Riley | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
47 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
48 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
49 | SALISTRA Emilia | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
50 | BURICEA Ada | 18% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
51 | YUMIACO Nylah | 23% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
52 | LIN Isabel | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
53 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
54 | JAMES Ashley | 13% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
55 | CHIEM Karen | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
55 | KANE Chloe | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
55 | ZHAO Yanning | 40% | 45% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
58 | REVAK Kelly | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
59 | CHAN Allison M. | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
60 | GINTOWT Catherine | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.