Premier Challenge ROC/RJCC/RPC

Cadet Men's Saber

Sunday, September 15, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 BERA Enzo - - - 1% 11% 40% 47%
2 LIU Kevin - - - 1% 8% 34% 57%
3 MCDONALD Finn - 2% 9% 25% 34% 23% 6%
3 SUBA Lucas - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 27%
5 ZHENG LEON - - 1% 6% 25% 43% 25%
6 YOOK Isaac - - 3% 12% 31% 37% 17%
7 WANG ANDREW CHANG - - - - 6% 32% 61%
8 MEHAN Nicholas - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
9 SUN Andrew - - 3% 15% 32% 35% 14%
10 WAXLER Ryan - - 2% 13% 36% 40% 9%
11 PORTER Dupree - - 5% 22% 39% 28% 6%
12 PEREIRA Beckham - - 1% 8% 27% 40% 23%
13 PINTO Marcus - - 1% 10% 33% 42% 13%
14 PRIEUR Christian F. - - 4% 16% 34% 33% 12%
14 SADHU Neiyam - 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2%
16 ROSADO Sebastian 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
17 TSAO Alister - 2% 11% 28% 35% 19% 4%
18 TSAO Oliver - - 4% 15% 32% 35% 15%
19 KETT Richard 4% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
20 KENNEDY Tomás - 2% 12% 29% 34% 18% 4%
20 HENDERSON Lucas - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
22 DAI Zihou - - 6% 24% 39% 25% 5%
23 CIEMINS Henry - 2% 13% 31% 34% 17% 3%
24 AROUNA Ilan 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
25 SCHIMEL Luke - 2% 12% 31% 36% 17% 3%
26 AO Christopher - 1% 7% 22% 37% 27% 6%
27 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas - 1% 4% 17% 35% 32% 11%
28 BALE ATMAN - 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
29 LIU Andrew - 1% 11% 34% 36% 16% 2%
30 KARAVAS Nicholas 2% 14% 30% 32% 17% 5% -
31 MERMEGAS Alexander - 2% 9% 26% 35% 22% 5%
32 WANG Max - 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5%
33 CHEN Jonathan - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
34 DOMINIQUE Remson - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
35 LUCAS William - 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1%
36 DE SIENA Salvatore 1% 6% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2%
37 JI Johnson - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
38 ALAVE Kyle - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
39 WEI William - 3% 15% 34% 34% 12% 1%
40 ZWAKA Jonas 3% 17% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
41 JAIN Karanvir 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
42 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - - 2% 15% 36% 36% 12%
43 SONG Aidan 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
44 SAKAYEDA Jacob - 5% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
45 NAYAK Surin K. - 4% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
46 SHEYNZON Benjamin 5% 39% 39% 15% 2% - -
47 BAHK Caleb 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
48 CLARK Gabriel - - 2% 11% 31% 40% 16%
49 LAMTAN Christoffer - 3% 18% 38% 31% 9% 1%
50 GREENE Kevin 4% 24% 38% 25% 8% 1% -
51 ZHAO Royce 1% 7% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
52 SAYAR Luke 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
53 WASCO Andrew 2% 18% 38% 30% 10% 2% -
54 LOO Jason - 5% 20% 35% 29% 11% 1%
55 ZHANG Ray - 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
56 HO Nathaniel - 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% 1%
57 RAJMOHAN Arya 2% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
58 BELAND Riley James "RJ" - 3% 19% 38% 30% 8% 1%
59 DOSTAL Maximilian - 6% 36% 38% 16% 3% -
60 LIM Brandon - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
61 TASIKAS Peter 1% 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
62 LIU Ryan 1% 10% 27% 34% 21% 6% 1%
63 FIROOZI Sam 26% 40% 25% 8% 1% - -
64 WEISS Toby 2% 16% 34% 31% 14% 3% -
65 LUAN Mark - 1% 5% 19% 35% 30% 10%
66 O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan - 2% 13% 31% 35% 16% 2%
67 STEWART Samuel 11% 33% 35% 17% 4% - -
68 ZHANG Simon 12% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
69 LEVIN Jacob 3% 15% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
70 AMAGOWNI Dhruv 8% 29% 37% 20% 5% 1% -
71 NOVOJILOV Daniel 18% 59% 20% 3% - - -
72 DEMERS Bodhi 11% 34% 35% 16% 4% - -
73 VISH Manyu 26% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
74 HAUSLER Jayden 9% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1% -
75 LIU Alexander 24% 44% 26% 6% 1% - -
76 TRZEPLA Max 3% 14% 30% 31% 17% 4% -
77 REILLY Xavier 22% 40% 28% 9% 2% - -
78 VINTFELD Cameron 26% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
79 HUGHES Sean 1% 10% 31% 35% 18% 4% -
80 YANG Byron 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
81 WANG Theodore 14% 37% 34% 13% 2% - -
82 LEE Korbon 76% 22% 2% - - - -
83 MATTOO Dhruv 2% 15% 34% 32% 14% 3% -
84 OREN Daniel 14% 40% 32% 12% 2% - -
85 PATEL Kiran 81% 18% 1% - - - -
86 WONG Reagan 2% 15% 34% 34% 14% 2% -
87 VINTFELD Liam 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1% -
88 JIANG Terence 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
88 LI Aidan 69% 29% 2% - - - -
88 LI Liam 57% 34% 8% 1% - - -
91 KULKARNI Ishir 60% 33% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.