Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
2 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
3 | MCDONALD Finn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
3 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
5 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
6 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
7 | WANG ANDREW CHANG | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
8 | MEHAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
9 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
10 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 48% | 9% |
11 | PORTER Dupree | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
12 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
13 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 13% |
14 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
14 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
16 | ROSADO Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
17 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
18 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
19 | KETT Richard | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
20 | HENDERSON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
22 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
23 | CIEMINS Henry | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
24 | AROUNA Ilan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
25 | SCHIMEL Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
26 | AO Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 6% |
27 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
28 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
29 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
30 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
31 | MERMEGAS Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
32 | WANG Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
33 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
34 | DOMINIQUE Remson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
35 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
36 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
37 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
38 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
39 | WEI William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
40 | ZWAKA Jonas | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
41 | JAIN Karanvir | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | BROENING-CHAI Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% |
43 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
44 | SAKAYEDA Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
45 | NAYAK Surin K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
46 | SHEYNZON Benjamin | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
47 | BAHK Caleb | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
48 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
49 | LAMTAN Christoffer | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
50 | GREENE Kevin | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
51 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
52 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
53 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
54 | LOO Jason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
55 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
56 | HO Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
57 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
58 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
59 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
60 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
61 | TASIKAS Peter | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
62 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
63 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
64 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
65 | LUAN Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
66 | O'LOUGHLIN Quinlan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
67 | STEWART Samuel | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
68 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
69 | LEVIN Jacob | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
70 | AMAGOWNI Dhruv | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
71 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | 100% | 82% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
72 | DEMERS Bodhi | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
73 | VISH Manyu | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
74 | HAUSLER Jayden | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
75 | LIU Alexander | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
76 | TRZEPLA Max | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
77 | REILLY Xavier | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
78 | VINTFELD Cameron | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
79 | HUGHES Sean | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
80 | YANG Byron | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
81 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
82 | LEE Korbon | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
83 | MATTOO Dhruv | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
84 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 86% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
85 | PATEL Kiran | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
86 | WONG Reagan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
87 | VINTFELD Liam | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
88 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
88 | LI Aidan | 100% | 31% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
88 | LI Liam | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | KULKARNI Ishir | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.