Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BULAVKO Sonia | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 2 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 3 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 3 | GAO Aretha R. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | |
| 5 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 36% |
| 6 | CHU Audrey | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 7 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
| 8 | KETKAR Mallika | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 9 | WOLF Isabella A. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 10 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 11 | LEE Sumin | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 12 | PROCTOR Sara J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 13 | LEE Michelle | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 14 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 15 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 16 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 17 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 23% |
| 18 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 19 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 20 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 21 | GERARDIN Marie | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 23 | KWON Athina | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 24 | MEHROTRA Anya | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 26 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 28 | BECCHINA Olivia | 1% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 29 | STOJANOVIC Mina | 12% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | KIMURA Kimberley H. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 31 | KIM Diane E. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 32 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 33 | YOUNG Ashley | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 34 | KANG Dahyun | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
| 35 | ZHANG Tina | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 36 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | - | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 37 | LIU Jennifer L. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 37 | BROOKS Tean R. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
| 39 | CHAN Paree A. | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 40 | MYERS A Helen Sophia | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 41 | BARNES Olivia R. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 42 | BRILL Sophie | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 43 | LIU Christina A. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 44 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
| 45 | MARTUS Cosima O. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 46 | RUSSELL Renata | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 47 | ERTAS Eileen | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 50 | GU Sarah | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 51 | TYAGI Octavia I. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 51 | SINHA Zara | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 53 | CAO Catherine H. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 54 | JIN Jasmine | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 55 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 56 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 57 | LIEBER Josephine A. | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LEE Olive | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 59 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 60 | MORGAN Lexiss M. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 61 | JI Catherine | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 62 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 63 | JIANG Corina | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 64 | QURESHI Aafreen | 1% | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 65 | DU Angela | 27% | 45% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | CHOI Eunice | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | BONDAR Nika | 22% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 68 | SMIK Leonie A. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 69 | UPPALAPATI Sriya | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 71 | DING Sandra | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | YU Bailey | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | JIANG Claire | 28% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 74 | HUANG audrey | 24% | 44% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | STRATTON Alexia | 63% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | FUNG Carina W. | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | DHILLON Ria | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 79 | BRYANT Michelle | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.