Anaheim , CA - Anaheim, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BULAVKO Sonia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
2 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
3 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
3 | GAO Aretha R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | |
5 | YEU Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 36% |
6 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
7 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
8 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
9 | WOLF Isabella A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
10 | CHAN Cheri K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
11 | LEE Sumin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
12 | PROCTOR Sara J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
13 | LEE Michelle | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
14 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
15 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
16 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
17 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 23% |
18 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
19 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
20 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 12% |
21 | GERARDIN Marie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 5% | - |
22 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
23 | KWON Athina | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
24 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 3% | |
25 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 7% |
26 | LEANG Andrea K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
27 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
28 | BECCHINA Olivia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
29 | STOJANOVIC Mina | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
30 | KIMURA Kimberley H. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% | |
31 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
32 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
33 | YOUNG Ashley | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
34 | KANG Dahyun | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
35 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
36 | TONCHEVA Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
37 | LIU Jennifer L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
37 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | |
39 | CHAN Paree A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 5% | - |
40 | MYERS A Helen Sophia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
41 | BARNES Olivia R. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
42 | BRILL Sophie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
43 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
44 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 2% |
45 | MARTUS Cosima O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
46 | RUSSELL Renata | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
47 | ERTAS Eileen | 100% | 97% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
48 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
49 | YAMAGUCHI Kate M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
50 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
51 | TYAGI Octavia I. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | - |
51 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | CAO Catherine H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
54 | JIN Jasmine | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
55 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
56 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
57 | LIEBER Josephine A. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | LEE Olive | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
59 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
60 | MORGAN Lexiss M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
61 | JI Catherine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
62 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
63 | JIANG Corina | 100% | 93% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
64 | QURESHI Aafreen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
65 | DU Angela | 100% | 73% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
66 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
67 | BONDAR Nika | 100% | 78% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
68 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
69 | UPPALAPATI Sriya | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
70 | TSANG JAFFE Avi | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
71 | DING Sandra | 100% | 92% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
72 | YU Bailey | 100% | 82% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
73 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
74 | HUANG audrey | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
75 | STRATTON Alexia | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | SHERTZ Kira E. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
77 | FUNG Carina W. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
78 | DHILLON Ria | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
79 | BRYANT Michelle | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.