The Athletico Center - Northbrook, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XU Chenyu | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% | |
2 | NING Miranda | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% | |
3 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% | |
3 | OLELE Ifechi | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
5 | CHI Zoe | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
6 | LI Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
7 | CHEN Allison | 3% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | |
8 | KANE Alexa | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% | |
9 | ZHANG Jane | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
10 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
11 | CHOI Arianna | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
12 | CHEN Julia Z. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
13 | JU Jennifer | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% | |
14 | BOBE Arianna | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
15 | YU Chloe | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 42% | 17% | |
16 | LI Allison | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
17 | JIANG chenxi | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
18 | FENG Esther | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
19 | PEKKER Amina | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | |
20 | MACAL Zoey | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
21 | CAI Melody | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
22 | HUFF Elizabeth | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
23 | CHO Josephine | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
24 | MAENG Gloria | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
25 | YOUNG Penelope | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
26 | PEKKER Adel | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
27 | LAI Juliet | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
28 | DOROSHKEVICH Maria | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
29 | NISHANTH Krishvi | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
30 | DOMONKOS Mary Alanna | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
31 | GU Ella | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
32 | ZHAO Rachel | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
33 | KWAK Olivia | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
34 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 1% | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
35 | BRINDAVAN Vyahriti | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
36 | HUNER Campbell | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
37 | NEGRUT Sabina | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | SCHLIEP Camellia | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
39 | KWASNY Natalie | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
40 | YAO Astrid | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | VOGL Layla | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
42 | YAU Katelyn | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
43 | ALFARO Gia | < 1% | 9% | 51% | 32% | 6% | - | |
44 | HUANG Cynthia | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
45 | WORTENDYKE Evelyn | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.