Greater Richmond Convention Center - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HEADRICK Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 2 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% | |
| 3 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 33% |
| 3 | PENG Yue | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
| 5 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 6 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 23% |
| 7 | QU RuiTing | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 8 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 9 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 10 | CHO Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% | |
| 11 | WILKERSON Tobias | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 12 | SHIM Jae | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 13 | TSEN Mason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 16 | DEFFENBAUGH Vasily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | RODOCANACHI Hector | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 9% |
| 18 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 19 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 20 | DELONG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
| 21 | FONG Henry | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 22 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | SCHIFFHAUER Bram | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MIKHAIL Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 25 | MEDISETTI Arjun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 26 | HEADRICK Liam | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | HAGERMAN Mark | 100% | 94% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
| 29 | BIERL Asa | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
| 31 | CHANEY Charles | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 32 | KENDLER Micah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 33 | DILDA Griffin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 34 | BANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 35 | GATEWOOD Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 39 | YESYRKENOV George | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | MILLER Balthazar | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | PARY Jean Pierre | 100% | 98% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | GRIGGS Kaiden | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | STEPANIAN George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 44 | FEELY Benjamin | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | OH Ted | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 47 | MEROLLI Asaka | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | DEGUZMAN Holden | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 50 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | KUYKENDALL Lucas | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 83% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | MCCABE Kian | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | BURT Jonathan Parker | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BORAN Brooks | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 57 | KUYKENDALL Logan | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 58 | MOODY Wil | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.