French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WEISS Miles J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | - | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% |
| 3 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 5 | KULCSAR Viktor | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% |
| 6 | STEELE DeMario A. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 37% | 9% |
| 7 | KOKENGE Reid | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
| 8 | WANG Bryan | - | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
| 10 | BUELAU Matthew | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 11 | JONES Reilly | 1% | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 12 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | - | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 13 | POHL Merik A. | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 39% | 9% | |
| 14 | LANGE Henry C. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
| 15 | SOMIR Avinash V. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 16 | RODNEY Maxwell | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 18 | VELINOV Gabriel | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 19 | MASON Alexander T. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% |
| 20 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 36% | 7% | |
| 21 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | HUTTO Joshua | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 23 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | MOHOV Aleksey | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | DITTEL Aaron K. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
| 25 | JOHNSON Jay | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 2% | 32% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 1% | 10% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 29 | MILLER Owen | 3% | 22% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HUNKER Frederick | 39% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | 17% | 56% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 32 | IGNATIK Piotr | 11% | 56% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | CHU Duong | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 34 | VERWORN Jonathan | 37% | 47% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | RAMIREZ Alan | 7% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | HUGHES Evan | 26% | 48% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | HILTON Jacob | 77% | 22% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 38 | KRAVCENKO Nikita | 17% | 43% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | LUGO Emmanuel | 67% | 30% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | BARBER James | 12% | 65% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | FRIEDMAN Andres | 65% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.