French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WEISS Miles J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | |
2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
3 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
3 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
5 | KULCSAR Viktor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
6 | STEELE DeMario A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 9% |
7 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
8 | WANG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
9 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 20% |
10 | BUELAU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
11 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
12 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
13 | POHL Merik A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 9% | |
14 | LANGE Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% |
15 | SOMIR Avinash V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
16 | RODNEY Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 2% |
17 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
18 | VELINOV Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
19 | MASON Alexander T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% |
20 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 7% | |
21 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 93% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | |
22 | HUTTO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
23 | WANG Maxwell L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
23 | MOHOV Aleksey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
25 | DITTEL Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 14% | 1% |
25 | JOHNSON Jay | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
27 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 98% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
27 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
29 | MILLER Owen | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | HUNKER Frederick | 100% | 61% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
31 | DWITYABASWARA Emil | 100% | 83% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
32 | IGNATIK Piotr | 100% | 89% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
33 | CHU Duong | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
34 | VERWORN Jonathan | 100% | 63% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
35 | RAMIREZ Alan | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
36 | HUGHES Evan | 100% | 74% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
37 | HILTON Jacob | 100% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
38 | KRAVCENKO Nikita | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
39 | LUGO Emmanuel | 100% | 33% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
40 | BARBER James | 100% | 88% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
41 | FRIEDMAN Andres | 100% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.