Fike Recreation Center - Piedmont, SC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CAMPBELL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 2 | LIU Hangda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 3 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 13% |
| 3 | MILES Greyson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 8% |
| 5 | HERNANDEZ Veronica L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 6 | MCARTHUR Kemp | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 8% |
| 7 | COUSINS Patrick | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% | 2% |
| 8 | MASON-DARNELL Zoe | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | HAN Nathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | SHULER Alden | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 11 | WATERS Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
| 12 | WELCH Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 13 | RILEY Owen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | LEE Junehyuk | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 16% | - |
| 15 | BAIRD Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 16 | COLLETTE Tobias | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | WANDEL Ethan S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 18 | HAZEL Susan L. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ARNOLD jacob | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | FLYNN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 22 | HAYWOOD Madison | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | MCLAUGHLIN Carter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 10% |
| 24 | HUGHES Kayla | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | SANDERS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 26 | OH Seonghun | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | SMITH Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 19% | 1% | - |
| 28 | KADRIC Max | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 29 | BARRETT John | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CARDINAL Elise | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 31 | HOANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 32 | PUTNAM Nicholas | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SCOTT Ford | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | DAILEY John | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | LANDRY Calem | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LIONBERGER Gillian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | BALL Jada | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 38 | MARTIN Stella | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 39 | DEMPSEY-GANTENBEIN Ace | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | DZIELINSKI Sarah | 100% | 94% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | MCGOWAN Ana | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.