Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Div I-A Men's Foil

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LU Yikai - - - - 2% 19% 80%
2 LEE Christopher T. - - 1% 6% 24% 43% 27%
3 LEE Benjamin H. - - - - 1% 21% 77%
3 HICKEY Connor 1% 14% 38% 34% 12% 2%
5 MAO Lucas - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17%
6 GATRELL Mitchell E. - - - 2% 12% 40% 46%
7 SEZER Kaya - - - 1% 11% 42% 46%
8 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 1% 7% 31% 45% 14% 2% -
9 HOWLAND Jonas - - 4% 18% 37% 31% 9%
10 LEUNG Ethan - - - 1% 8% 37% 55%
11 STRINGER David - - 3% 17% 39% 33% 7%
12 PALMA Nathan Anthony - 1% 8% 24% 35% 24% 6%
13 SINHA Verdhaan - - 3% 15% 35% 34% 12%
14 TAN Xinlai - 2% 17% 40% 34% 7% -
15 MCISAAC Finn - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17%
16 SOYSKI Harrison Q. - - 1% 11% 39% 39% 10%
17 MYERS Dean - - - 1% 9% 36% 54%
18 CHUANG Oscar - 1% 5% 20% 35% 30% 10%
19 JU Alexander (Alex) Y. - - - - 1% 14% 85%
20 LOCKWOOD Jacob 2% 16% 37% 32% 11% 1% -
21 ALONSO Vinicius - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
22 MAVANI Krishna 4% 19% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
23 ZHONG Maxwell - 1% 7% 23% 38% 27% 5%
24 BAILEY William F. - - 1% 10% 38% 40% 10%
25 SORRENTINO Salvatore - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% 1%
26 ARATA Connor - - 3% 24% 44% 25% 4%
27 PAI Dong-Ying - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
28 FORTUNE Alexander J. - - - 1% 11% 45% 43%
29 FLANAGAN James - 3% 16% 37% 33% 10%
30 XIAO Bowen - 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
31 KUE Temujin 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% 1%
32 JURMAN Therin - 1% 9% 27% 39% 23% 2%
33 GNEUHS Sam - - 8% 38% 39% 13% 1%
34 SANTOS Carlos R. - 1% 9% 30% 39% 19% 3%
35 MARISI Gabriel - 1% 9% 32% 40% 17% 1%
36 YIN Zixin(Gavin) - 3% 23% 44% 26% 4% -
37 WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. - - 1% 6% 27% 45% 21%
38 WILKINS Mateo - - 5% 21% 39% 28% 7%
39 NAIDL Josiah - - 6% 27% 42% 23% 2%
40 EDWARDS Maxon - - 2% 14% 33% 36% 14%
41 ZAIDI Adil 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4% -
42 TOEWS Jackson 5% 21% 34% 28% 11% 2% -
43 MARTIN William - 3% 23% 40% 26% 7% -
44 DIEPSTRA Jeremy - 1% 11% 35% 38% 14% 1%
45 KALIPERSAD Neil A. 1% 8% 26% 34% 23% 7% 1%
46 KENNEDY Michael 1% 11% 29% 35% 19% 4% -
47 NOWAK Joseph A. - - 1% 9% 36% 52% 3%
48 HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
49 ASHIDA Tomoaki - 3% 15% 30% 32% 16% 3%
50 IRVINE Brody 1% 9% 30% 38% 18% 4% -
51 HEYBOER Jason - 7% 34% 41% 16% 2% -
52 VANOYEN Dominick - - 1% 12% 39% 40% 9%
53 KAIHATSU Edward J. - - 2% 12% 33% 39% 14%
54 LIU Yinhong - 4% 25% 40% 24% 6% -
55 STORER Alexander - 6% 35% 40% 17% 3% -
56 GLOVER George 3% 21% 40% 27% 8% 1% -
57 DING Zilin 4% 27% 40% 23% 6% 1% -
58 DUNLAP Ian 1% 12% 37% 35% 13% 2% -
59 MCCONKEY Tristan 2% 24% 55% 17% 2% - -
60 KABARITI Karim 4% 22% 39% 26% 8% 1% -
61 DELL George H. - 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
62 BERSCHEID Arthur 3% 20% 36% 29% 11% 2% -
63 FINDLER Zachary 48% 39% 12% 2% - - -
64 DECKER Evan M. - 3% 16% 37% 32% 11% 1%
65 GARSKE James 24% 43% 25% 6% 1% - -
66 VAGGALIS Denny 25% 52% 21% 2% - - -
67 CLARK Benjamin 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
68 TOWNE Benjamin 3% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
69 DIFRANK Tae 59% 33% 7% 1% - - -
70 PHONPRASANSACK Grayson 21% 46% 27% 6% - - -
71 HUNTER Phillip 10% 42% 35% 11% 2% -
72 DAVIS Benjamin 60% 34% 6% - - -
73 LAKAS Darius 58% 34% 7% 1% - - -
74 DURHAM Porter 5% 26% 43% 21% 4% - -
75 HOPKINS Dylan 31% 52% 15% 2% - - -
76 DRAWZ Chase 82% 16% 1% - - - -
77 CRUZ Ben 5% 49% 35% 10% 1% - -
78 ZINSER James 5% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
79 STELLPFLUG Zachary 36% 41% 18% 4% - - -
80 KIM Ethen 59% 37% 4% - - - -
81 REAUME Nate 34% 45% 18% 2% - - -
81 LINEBERRY CADEN 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
83 NEED William 23% 44% 26% 6% 1% - -
84 MCCONKEY Eric 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4% -
84 HEUER Weston 5% 27% 40% 22% 5% - -
86 CLIPPARD Erik J. 11% 38% 34% 14% 3% - -
87 XIE Michael 47% 44% 8% 1% - - -
88 BENSCH Vincent 24% 57% 17% 2% - - -
89 SKIBELL Cyrus 51% 42% 6% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.