Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Yikai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
| 2 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 3 | LEE Benjamin H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 77% |
| 3 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | |
| 5 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 6 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
| 7 | SEZER Kaya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 46% |
| 8 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 9 | HOWLAND Jonas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 10 | LEUNG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
| 11 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 12 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 13 | SINHA Verdhaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
| 14 | TAN Xinlai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | - |
| 15 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 16 | SOYSKI Harrison Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 10% |
| 17 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 18 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 19 | JU Alexander (Alex) Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% |
| 20 | LOCKWOOD Jacob | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 21 | ALONSO Vinicius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
| 22 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 24 | BAILEY William F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 10% |
| 25 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 26 | ARATA Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 29% | 4% |
| 27 | PAI Dong-Ying | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 28 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
| 29 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 30 | XIAO Bowen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 31 | KUE Temujin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 2% |
| 33 | GNEUHS Sam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 53% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% |
| 35 | MARISI Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
| 36 | YIN Zixin(Gavin) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 37 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
| 38 | WILKINS Mateo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 39 | NAIDL Josiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 2% |
| 40 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 41 | ZAIDI Adil | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 42 | TOEWS Jackson | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | MARTIN William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 44 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% |
| 45 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | KENNEDY Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 47 | NOWAK Joseph A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 3% |
| 48 | HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 49 | ASHIDA Tomoaki | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 50 | IRVINE Brody | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 51 | HEYBOER Jason | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 52 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 9% |
| 53 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 14% |
| 54 | LIU Yinhong | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 55 | STORER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 56 | GLOVER George | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | DING Zilin | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | DUNLAP Ian | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 59 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 100% | 98% | 73% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | KABARITI Karim | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | DELL George H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 62 | BERSCHEID Arthur | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | FINDLER Zachary | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | DECKER Evan M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 65 | GARSKE James | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | VAGGALIS Denny | 100% | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 67 | CLARK Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 68 | TOWNE Benjamin | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 69 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | PHONPRASANSACK Grayson | 100% | 79% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 71 | HUNTER Phillip | 100% | 90% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 72 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 73 | LAKAS Darius | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | DURHAM Porter | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | HOPKINS Dylan | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 76 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 77 | CRUZ Ben | 100% | 95% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 78 | ZINSER James | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 79 | STELLPFLUG Zachary | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 80 | KIM Ethen | 100% | 41% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 81 | REAUME Nate | 100% | 66% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 83 | NEED William | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | MCCONKEY Eric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 84 | HEUER Weston | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 86 | CLIPPARD Erik J. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 87 | XIE Michael | 100% | 53% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 88 | BENSCH Vincent | 100% | 76% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | SKIBELL Cyrus | 100% | 49% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.