Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 17% |
| 2 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 15% |
| 3 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 3 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 5 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 6 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 7 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 8% |
| 8 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 9 | BOUMEDIENNE Sami | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 10 | WANG Evan Haoxuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% |
| 11 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 12 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 13 | CAMP Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 15 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 16 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 18 | MILLER Lance | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 20 | BOSS Evan | 100% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CHEN Bowen | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 23 | LEHNER Brian | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 24 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% |
| 25 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 27 | RITTERBUSCH Timothy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 28 | HALL Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 29 | RIECK Brennan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 30 | STOKER Elliott | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | COHEN Henry | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 33 | ZIEGLER John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% |
| 34 | LIU Quincy | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BARFORD Giovanni | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 36 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 37 | CUI Franklin | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | RICHARDSON Ray | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 39 | PATEL Aayan | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | 96% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 42 | HERDMAN Julian | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | LIM-SEIWERT Armand | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | SAMUEL Nirmel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 46 | KTSANES Charlie | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SNYDER Alex | 100% | 95% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | APANASEWICZ Ethan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | BAGDONAS Olivier | 100% | 80% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | DESAI Aadi | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | NOMMENSEN William | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 52 | SMITH Bram | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | TICHENOR Abreham | 100% | 94% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | COSGROVE Franklin | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | CHOI Yunwoo | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | SEABLOOM Jack | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.