Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
2 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 75% |
3 | BING Charlotte | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
3 | HUANG Natalie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 37% | 11% |
5 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
6 | EYER Brooke | - | - | - | 6% | 40% | 45% | 9% |
7 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 30% |
8 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | - | 5% | 40% | 55% | |
9 | YIN Chloe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
10 | BO Iris | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 44% | 12% |
11 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
12 | HU Sophie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
13 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 18% |
14 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
15 | LI Christina | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
16 | JOO Sara | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
17 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
18 | WANG DINA C. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 55% | 26% | |
19 | BYK Karalina | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
20 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
21 | CASCONE Sophie | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
22 | ZHANG Selina | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
23 | TAO Isabella | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
24 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
25 | DONG Iris | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
26 | XING Melly | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
27 | LUO lucy | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
28 | LEO Jenna | - | 9% | 42% | 40% | 7% | - | |
29 | SINGH Evangelina | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
30 | ZHENG Annalyn | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
31 | XU Charlene | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
32 | HUANG Emma | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
33 | LI Doreen | 3% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | < 1% | - |
34 | ZHU Alivia | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
35 | ZHANG Caroline | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | YOUM Amelia | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | ZHANG Priscilla | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | YIN Emily | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
39 | ZHU Audrey | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
40 | SHI Micah | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
41 | KHETPAL Aalia | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | CHAN Hailey | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | - |
43 | SMART Athena | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 44% | 11% |
44 | FENG Claire | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
45 | ELLISON Ingrid | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
46 | LALONDE Beatrice | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | REILLY Carys | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
48 | GONG Maggie | 43% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
49 | SUN Nicole | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
50 | HUANG Gabrielle | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | YANG Catherine | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | HOLLIS Priscillia | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
53 | HAFEZ Sahar | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
54 | GE Deanna | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
55 | WU Charlotte | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
55 | YANG Hanli | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 1% |
57 | LIU Bella | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | VO Evelyn | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
59 | DONG Katelyn | 27% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
60 | MA Sophia | - | 9% | 41% | 41% | 8% | - | |
61 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
62 | SHUI Zola | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 7% | - |
63 | JIANG Ziqing | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
64 | LU Miaotian | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
65 | KUANG Bella | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | - |
66 | JU Victoria | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
67 | HEMPHILL Mia | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
68 | JIANG Ziqi | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
69 | CHOI Evie | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
70 | FAN Melody | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
71 | CLOUD Chrystie | 52% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
72 | ZHAO Victoria | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
73 | LI Beatrice | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
74 | HUANG Cynthia | 32% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
75 | HOO Bethia | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
76 | REN Luna Siyi | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
77 | KIM Lael | 34% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
78 | SUN Erin | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
79 | MA Laurie | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
80 | ZHANG Ziru | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | BENTLEY Amelia | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
82 | CARMEN Charlotte | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.