Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 2 | VALENCIA Jose | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Kaixuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 3 | LIN Grant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 5 | SUN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 6 | ZHAO Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
| 7 | DAI Zihou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 11% |
| 8 | SLAVNOV Anton | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 9 | OH Aster | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% |
| 10 | WEI Rian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
| 11 | GORDON Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | LIU Marvin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
| 13 | SADHU Neiyam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 14 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 27% |
| 15 | WONG Ron | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | CHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 18 | RINALDI Savio | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 19 | AGARWAAL Yohan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 20 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CAI fungyu | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 23 | NGO Emerson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 24 | KOZLOV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 18% |
| 25 | BADMUS Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
| 26 | FENG Brendan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 27 | JI Johnson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 28 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | ROH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 30 | SRIVATS Vedh | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 31 | TRZEPLA Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | KOREN George | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 33 | AO Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 21% |
| 34 | WONG Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | 1% |
| 35 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 36 | CHANG Timothy | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% | |
| 38 | CAI Jeff | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 15% |
| 39 | LIANG Morgan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 40 | LIU ERIC | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 41 | PAUL Jimmy | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 44 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | LIN Brendan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 46 | TASIKAS Peter | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 47 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 48 | KOSMIN Ivan | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | WONG Reagan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 51 | MELE Gianni | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | SUH Leo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 53 | WANG Edward | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 54 | OREN Daniel | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 55 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 56 | ISAYENKO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 57 | LOO Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | LEMERY Marc | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 59 | SINGH Sumair | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 60 | HENDERSON Louis | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 61 | D'AMELJ Edoardo | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 62 | CHEN Felix | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% |
| 63 | DATTILIO Aidan | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | CHEN Leo | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 65 | ZHANG Simon | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 66 | WONG Mac | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 67 | WANG ARAN | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 68 | KOREN David | 100% | 88% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | VIDREVICH David | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 71 | YANG LOUIS | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LEVY Daniel | 100% | 98% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 73 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 73 | ZALETAEV Jacob | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 75 | CHAVAN Aditya | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 62% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 75 | HATCH Oliver | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 78 | RIVERATAN Darshan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 79 | DAI Ethan | 100% | 55% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | MAKLIN David | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 81 | HEIMOV Brennan | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 82 | LEE Shane Gunn | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 83 | FILMORE Samuel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 84 | SUN Stephen | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 85 | SHAPIRO Simon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 86 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 87 | LI kevin | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 88 | PARK Sean | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 89 | LI Jayden | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 90 | PARK Layne | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 92 | LI Lucas | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 93 | HUANG Lucas | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.