Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GUO Woody | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
2 | CHEN Ryan | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 45% |
3 | SU Samuel | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
3 | GREENMAN Duke | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
5 | LOUIE Joseph | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% | |
6 | ROBINSON Samuel | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
7 | KIM Remington | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
8 | VERON Darius | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
9 | JAO Aaron | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
10 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
11 | WANG Devin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% |
12 | TANG Michael | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
13 | KIM Ian | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 22% |
14 | HSU Joshua | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
15 | DU Evan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 37% | 8% |
16 | KURUGANTI Vivaan | 5% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
17 | GACIOCH Noah | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 50% | 24% |
18 | GUO Luke | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
19 | HAMILTON Travis | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
20 | QIAO James | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
21 | NG Alexander | 4% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | RAHMAN Ali | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
23 | JAMES Kaden | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | KOFMAN David | - | - | 7% | 30% | 46% | 17% | |
25 | LI Grayson | - | 7% | 33% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
26 | LIU Max | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
27 | WONG Aaron | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
28 | MARTIN zachary | - | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
29 | DEVINENI Avyang | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
30 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | WANG Lucas | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
32 | WONG Vansen | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
33 | SCHIPPER Johann | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
34 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
35 | FU Adrian | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
36 | DILEEP Roshan | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
37 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
38 | MA Ryan | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
39 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
40 | SHIH Derek | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
41 | LIN Daniel | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
42 | LIN Jason | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
43 | YAO Tristan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
44 | HUA Nolan | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
45 | SONG Jonathan | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
46 | ZHU Owen | 1% | 9% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 1% | |
47 | GORDON David | 6% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
48 | DIESSNER Henry | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
49 | REYES Landon | 3% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
50 | KROTZ Nicolas | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | YU Brandon | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | KLINKNER Charlie | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
53 | BALUCAN Caelus | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
54 | LIU Xuyao | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | LEE Damon | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
56 | DING Max | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
57 | LUO Alvin Y. | 1% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
58 | WANG Dylan | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
59 | LO Stefan | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
60 | JU Shang | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
61 | ABRAHAM Aaron | 30% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
62 | TALATAM Arnav | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
63 | YU Haoyun | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
64 | OR Anson | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
65 | SISODIA Shauryaditya | 80% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
66 | AULAKH Eshaan | 2% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | TEJADA-ANDERSON Emmanuel | 41% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
68 | TAMHANE Sidhant | 15% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.